Vaginal Mesh Library: Texas Vaginal Mesh Attorney
Houston, San Antonio, Dallas, Austin Vaginal Mesh Attorney. Mesh Lawyer are ready to provide vaginal mesh attorney for women of Texas.
The Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits Go ahead, With Issuance of Latest Protective Order in Federal C.R. Bard Vaginal Mesh Litigation, Bernstein Liebhard LLP Reports Corp.
Well, one have continue to hear from women who have undergo acute transvaginal mesh complications, allegedly because of pelvic mesh products marketed by C.R. Bard and other device manufacturers.
The Transvaginal mesh lawsuits continue to advance in federal litigations presently ongoing in U.S. District Court, Southern District of West Virginia, Bernstein Liebhard LLP reports. On May 3rd, the Court released a Stipulated Protective Order in the C.R. Bard vaginal mesh litigation that set up procedures for the managing of potentially confidential information produced during discovery. (In re: C.R. Bard, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability Litigation – MDL No. 2187)
“We continue to hear from women who have undergone acute transvaginal mesh complications, allegedly because of pelvic mesh products marketed by C.R. Bard plus other device manufacturers and its nice to see finding continuing in this litigation, also forth seeing the onset of the first federal C.R. Bard bellwether trial coming month,” utter Bernstein Liebhard LLP, a countrywide law firm representing victims of defective drugs and medical devices. Firm partner, Jeffrey S. Grand, is serving on the Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee for the C.R. Bard litigation.
These Vaginal mesh lawsuits have been rising in courts right through the country since October 2008, when the FDA exposed that it had received more than 1,000 reports of critical transvaginal mesh complications over a three year period. In July 2011, the FDA released an update to that alert, caveat that there had been a five-fold raise in reports of acute complications associated with the usage of pelvic mesh in prolapsed repair, including mesh erosion through vaginal tissue, infection, pain, and urinary problems. The FDA also modified the place it had taken in 2008 regarding frequency of these problems, stating in the alert that such injuries were not rare.*
Besides the C.R. Bard litigation, numerous other consolidated proceedings established for vaginal mesh lawsuits are presently ongoing in the Southern District of West Virginia, including: American Medical Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability Litigation (“MDL No. 2325”); In re: Boston Scientific Corp., Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability Litigation (“MDL No. 2326); and In re: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability Litigation (“MDL No. 2327”). Bernstein Liebhard LLP partner, Jeffrey S. Grand, is serving on the Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee in these proceedings too.
And the federal transvaginal mesh litigations, consolidated proceedings are also happening in New Jersey Superior Court, Atlantic County, involving products manufactured by Johnson & Johnson’s Ethicon unit and C.R. Bard. (In re: Pelvic Mesh Litigation/Bard, No. L-6339-10, and In re: Pelvic Mesh/Gynecare Litigation, No. 6341-10). In March, the nation’s first trial involving an Ethicon mesh product finished in the New Jersey litigation, with the jury awarding more than $11 million to the plaintiff, including $7.76 million in punitive compensation. Mr. Grand, who is serving as Co-Liaison Counsel in both New Jersey pelvic mesh litigations, also served on the trial team for that case. (Gross v. Gynecare Inc., Atl-L-6966-10, Superior Court of Atlantic County, New Jersey (Atlantic City))
Court documents point out that the first trial in the federal C.R. Bard pelvic mesh litigation is programmed to start on June 11th. In July 2012, a California Superior Court jury awarded $5.5 million to a woman and her husband for transvaginal mesh complications she sustained following implantation with two C.R. Bard products (Scott v. Kannappan, S-1500-CV-266034-WDE, and Superior Court for Kern County, California, Bakersfield). The Victims of alleged transvaginal mesh complications may be entitled to compensation for their medical bills, pain and suffering, and other injuries. A wealth of information regarding vaginal mesh lawsuits can be found at Bernstein Liebhard’s website.
Bernstein Liebhard LLP is a New York-based law firm entirely representing hurt persons in complex individual and class action lawsuits countrywide since 1993, including those who have been debilitated by hazardous drugs, defective medical devices and consumer products. The firm has been title by The National Law Journal to the “Plaintiffs’ Hot List,” distinguish the top plaintiffs’ firms in the country, for the past 10 consecutive years.
It seems that, Women have always been the target of manufacturers for novel drugs as well as medical devices. Women plus the elderly are the leading users of contemporary drugs also devices. These comprises: Vaginal mesh, bladder sling, Mirena IUD, Yaz, Yasmin, DePuy Hip Replacement, Stryker Rejuvinate hip replacement, GranuFlo, Pradaxa, NaturaLyte, Metronic Infuse Bone Graft along with others.
Day by day we hear about hazardous treatment plus medical devices hurting women. The (FDA) U.S. Food and Drug Administration regularly reports on investigations, warnings, injuries and recalls. Regrettably much of the press adjoining these drugs and devices fails to highlight the fact that a mounting number of these products are injuring one precise group, women. This goes back to the Silicone Breast Implant Class Action lawsuits.
The Birth control pills and policy, surgical implant such as the vaginal mesh, Mirena IUD, NuvaRing along with metal-on-metal hip implants are marketed toward women. All of these goods have had enduring unsympathetic incident reports of dangerous risks as well as injuries to the very users they are assumed to be benefiting… These products are not being sufficiently tested for the people they are supposed to be helping.
Even though they are made for women, numerous of these medical products are not designed for women or tested on women before flooding the market. As a result, poorly designed products are pushed on treating physicians devoid of proper details and then presented to women like:
Bladder sling Lawsuits
Birth Injury Lawsuits
Depuy Hip Recall
Metronic Infuse Bone Graft
Stryker Hip Lawsuits
Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits
Zimmer Hip Lawsuits
Zimmer Knee Lawsuits
The Birth Control pills:
The Yaz and Yasmin are two admired birth control medications that include drospirenone, a manmade hormone that emulates the effects of progesterone. These pills restrain ovulation as well thus avert pregnancy. These birth control pills have been shown to cause nlood clots, stroke, pulmonary embolism plus deep vein thrombosis in young women. These impediments can have long-term health harms also in various cases, may even be fatal.
The Transvaginal mesh is a medical tool utilized to refurbish pelvic organ prolapse, bladder prolapse, bowel prolapse or urinary incontinence. The mesh product itself was originally utilized as, or considerably resembling, a hernia product already on the market.
And Mesh was not exclusively designed for vaginal use. Contrasting mesh used to mend hernias, vaginal mesh is used on internal organs that are moving also flexing. When the mesh stays rigid, complications crop up, like erosion, infection and severe relentless pain.
In relation to a 2011 FDA report, some of the most commonly reported complication risks consist of:
Infections in tissue surrounding the mesh
Damage to surrounding organs
Bladder and Bowel perforation
Erosion or protrusion of the mesh
Pain with intercourse
Urinary tract infections and problems
Vaginal scarring or shrinkage
Johnson and Johnson has just removed 4 of the Gynecare mesh from the market
Metal-on-Metal Hip Implants such as DePuy’s ASR Acetabular Cup System have been evoked because of an augmented risk of treacherous side effects. These hip substitutes have had a harsh effect on woman because of the angle of the pelvic girth and lesser bone structure.
Seemingly, some side effects of metal-on-metal hip replacement devices comprise:
Blood metal poisoning (metallosis)
Soft tissue damage
Besides, smaller statured women are having more failures also problems with this product. Seeing as the metal-on-metal hip replacement system was designed with a superior ball and cup, it doesn’t work on a slighter framed person. As a result, a disproportionate number of women are being injured. Orthopedic experts believe that insufficient testing and a fatal product flaw have contributed to the serious injuries suffered by patients who have received the metal-on-metal hip implant. Because of the failure rate of the product as well as rate of injuries, some DePuy metal-on-metal hip replacement systems have since been recollect.